Over the past several weeks, I’ve spent a lot of time refining not only my personal trading process, but also how I want to serve my trading community moving forward.
One thing I’ve learned over time is that growth in trading does not come from watching more pairs, adding more indicators, or creating more complexity. In many cases, consistency comes from reducing noise and becoming more intentional with your focus.
With that in mind, I’ve officially streamlined the currency pairs I will be actively trading and analyzing moving forward.
My primary focus pairs going forward will now be:
- AUDCAD
- EURUSD
- GBPUSD
- USDCAD
- USDCHF
These are the pairs that currently align best with the way I personally read market structure, momentum, and flow. Over time, I’ve learned that certain pairs naturally “fit your eye” better as a trader, and these are the pairs where I believe I can provide the clearest and most consistent analysis.
As part of this shift, I’ve also decided to streamline the type of educational market analysis I share publicly with the trading community.
Going forward, my primary public focus will be centered around BRACE setups.
Why I’m Choosing BRACE
BRACE continues to be one of the cleanest and most practical methods for identifying high-probability market opportunities while still remaining simple enough for newer traders to understand and apply with confidence.
What I appreciate most about BRACE is that it teaches traders patience, confirmation, and structure instead of emotional entries and prediction-based trading.
In my opinion, BRACE offers:
- cleaner directional confirmation
- easier entry recognition
- more structured trade planning
- and a more beginner-friendly learning curve
while still being respected and appreciated by more advanced traders.
While ACE remains an excellent method, I’ve made the decision to reduce the amount of ACE-focused public analysis moving forward.
This decision is not because ACE lacks value. In fact, I still believe it is a powerful framework. My decision is purely based on protecting my bandwidth and capacity to give proper attention to the strategies I choose to teach publicly.
Rather than stretching myself too thin trying to consistently provide multiple forms of analysis at the same time, I would rather focus deeply on the areas where I believe I can bring the most clarity and consistency to the community.
Regarding SFM
Over the course of refining my own trading process, I’ve also developed a proprietary framework known as SFM (Structural Flow Method).
SFM is a more advanced internal structure and flow-based trading framework that I currently use privately in my professional trading process and in my work with clients.
At this time, SFM will remain proprietary and will not be part of the public trading community content or educational analysis.
As traders grow, it’s important to recognize the difference between:
- educational frameworks
and - proprietary execution systems
and I believe protecting certain aspects of my professional process is both necessary and appropriate as I continue to evolve as a trader and funds manager.
Final Thoughts
Moving forward, my goal is simple:
less noise, more clarity, and higher-quality analysis.
I believe this streamlined approach will allow me to provide more focused insights, better educational content, and clearer trade opportunities for the trading community while continuing to grow and refine my own professional trading process behind the scenes.
Sometimes growth in trading is not about adding more.
Sometimes it’s about removing what no longer serves the mission.
